L.F.E. collage banner

Home
Contact


News

Community
Events
Map of Area
About LFE
Clubs and Groups
Gallery
Shops
Services
Businesses
Schools


General
Links
Places to Visit
Transport & Travel

News - Local
S106 Contributions spent out of the parish! - Updated 30 Dec 11 Source B.D.C.

Leicester Forest East is currently proving a very popular place for developers to build their new dwellings. There have been 160+ dwellings recently granted planning approval by Blaby District Council in L.F.E. Part of the planning process is for the developers is to provide a contribution Section 106 (S106) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990)

These agreements are a way of delivering or addressing matters that are necessary to make a development acceptable in planning terms such as supporting the provision of services and infrastructure, such as highways, recreational facilities, education, health and affordable housing. Wouldn't it make sense for these S106 monies to be spent within the parish that generates it.......

New homes image

In an application for a group of 14 dwellings on Hinckley Road, L.F.E. a contribution of £43,396.04 for education was requested by Blaby District Council as part of the process, to accommodate the need generated by this development. This money when it becomes available is to be spent outside of the parish and is destined be used to remodel or enhance existing facilities at one of the Braunstone Primary Schools.

Last year Holmfield Primary School in L.F.E. was closed and demolished soon after. As a consequence of that, our only other primary school Stafford Leys Community Primary School is over subscribed. There are now a number of children living within the parish that have no choice and have to travel for 2+ miles each way to school, due to the lack of foresight by L.C.C.’s in closing Holmfield Primary School without the necessary alternative facilities being in place within the parish.

The S106 Monies should be directed to and made available and could go someway to providing additional facilities at Stafford Leys School, allowing the parents of local youngsters the choice to select a school within walking distance of their school. Unless of course L.F.E. is to be enveloped within the Leicester City boundary!

By the way L.C.C. are proposing to build up to 60 further dwellings in Leicester Forest East on the old Holmfield Primary School site! Do we have sufficient schooling within the parish to accommodate additional children?

B.D.C. Recommendation
That Application 11/0178/1/PX be granted subject to the applicants entering into section 106 agreement to secure the following :-
County Developer Contributions: Education – A contribution of £43,396.04 is requested to accommodate the need generated by this development. It would be used to remodel or enhance existing facilities at one of the Braunstone Primary Schools.

Decision notice 11/0178/1/PX Opens new window to PDF file

The following are letters from the L.F.E. Parish magazine LiFE that reported issues raised by parents, highlighting the impact that the closure of Holmfield Primary School would have. Children that were in the catchment area are now expected to travel outside of the parish to go to school. The map below indicates the alternative schools available to L.F.E. children. Note: Although Stafford Leys is the obvious alternative it is not in the catchment area!

Map Showing local schools

County Councillor David Parsons Summer 2011 Life Magazine
A number of parents have contacted me concerning school catchment areas following the closure of Holmfield Primary School. At present, the boundary runs down the motorway and I think parents should have the right to send their children to Stafford Leys Primary School if they so wish. This also of course has implications for post-primary education. I should be grateful to hear from residents of LFE who are affected by these catchment area boundaries.

Contact Business. email: david.parsons@leics.gov.uk or Phone: 0116 239 0869 Ward Issues Only

Spring LiFE 2011 Letters
Dear LFE Council
I have lived on Packer Avenue for over 40 years, first with my parents and now with my own young family. Most parents are aware of the catchments for local schools when moving into an area. As I have grown up in LFE, I was well aware of the two LFE primary schools – Holmfield and Stafford Leys.

The M1 bridge is the school catchment boundary. I now have a young son coming up to school age, and as I live in LFE, I assumed his school would be Stafford Leys, as Holmfield has now gone.

However, to my amazement, I am told by County Hall that we are in the catchment area for three schools in Braunstone – Kingsway, Ravenhurst, and Millfield.

Stafford Leys is within a few minutes walking distance, but I am expected to walk my four-year-old to one of these other schools – the nearest being 1.5 miles away and about a 30 minute walk, the furthest 2.6 miles away, about a 55 minute walk.

I find it hard to understand the reasoning for making primary school children trek all this way when there is a primary school within a few minutes walking distance, and in the parish where we live.

The parish boundary begins at Park Drive. Why not move the school catchment boundary to the parish boundary? This would allow all LFE children to go to school without having a near 5.5 mile walk to school each day in all weathers. As a working mum, this causes many problems in my daily routine. And not everyone has a car!
Mrs K. Gilbert

LiFE Editor replies: This appears to be a knock-on effect of closing Holmfield
school that had not been realised. The matter has been referred by your Parish Council to Cllr. D. Parsons for investigation. It would also do no harm to make your own representations.

Summer 2011 LiFE Letters
Dear LFE Council,
In response to Mrs K Gilberts letter in the spring edition of LiFE, I would like to point out the fact that; very young children have to travel so far to their catchment schools isn’t “a knock on effect of closing Holmfield school that had not been realised”.

It was a point raised by myself and many other families in a similar position to Mrs Gilbert. Our concerns didn’t appear to be taken very seriously by the county council, who seemed to have an agenda from the beginning of the consultation process.

I used to have a 5 minute walk with my children to school, I now have a 5 mile round trip 3 times a day - my younger son is doing half days in nursery. Not only is this time consuming, unenvironmental and costly, but we don’t have the same sense of community that you get from attending a local school.

Of course, families in LFE can still apply to Stafford Leys, but it should be made clear that as Stafford Leys doesn’t have a year 6, so children out of the current catchment area will then have to hope for a place at South Charnwood, or transfer to one of the Braunstone town schools for a year.

If they were to get a place at South Charnwood I believe the family would then have to pay the transport costs to get them there. It is also worth mentioning that any primary school child who has to travel more than 2 miles to school is entitled to travel expenses, whether that be taxi or bus fare or fuel allowance for those who do drive their children to school.

I agree that the catchment areas should be looked at again, but it seems too little too late - all of the local schools are oversubscribed, and with new housing developments being proposed it seems inevitable that our children’s education will suffer.
J Miller